Methods:Fifty breast cancer patients attending a routine medical consultation were approached to participate in a cancer mutations study (BRCA1/BRCA2) at a public university hospital in
Results:Amongst the 50 patients invited to participate in the research, all provided informed consent, 21/50 of the patients did not ask any questions. From the remaining 29/50 (who did ask questions), 23/50 asked about the research and 6/50 about aspects related to their diseases’ diagnosis and prognosis. Data indicated that only 28/50 patients understood that breast cancer risk determination implied that the disease could be passing on in the family. Of those 28/50 patients who understood “risk” only 11/50 patients displayed concern regarding close relatives: 9/50 were very worried and the remaining 2/50 expressed positive utilitarian ideas and feelings.
Conclusion:Use of informed consent, which emphasizes values such as competence, autonomy and citizenship, is inadequate in bringing about patient comprehension of genetic risk. The study pointed out the paternalistic doctor-patient relationship values, which are dominant in Brazilian public health care system. Although genetic information is constructed as empowering, in promising ability to control future health, the majority of the breast cancer patients did not experience mutation investigation as enabling them to act as ''responsible genetic subjects'' towards children and other family members.
Learning Objectives: Examine affected women's perceptions and experiences of genetic test for hereditary breast cancer. Explore affected women's explanations about what caused their breast cancer. Recognize the importance of personal and family experiences in meaning production about disease.
See more of: Panel Sessions