association between work psychosocial aspects and psychological
distress (PD). The Job Content Questionnaire (JCQ) was used to measure
the work psychosocial dimensions. Objective: to evaluate the validity
of JCQ in predicting psychological distress among workers from
different occupational groups. Methodology: Five epidemiological
cross-sectional studies were carried out in populations from the State
of Bahia, Brazil: one population-based study (a representative sample
of Feira de Santana City; 1,311 workers) and four different
occupational groups studies: teachers (808), professors (314), dentists
(130) and nurses (502). The population-based study compared formal and
informal workers. Similar methodology and procedures were used in all
four studies. SRQ-20 was used to measure psychological distress.
Results: A similar pattern of the association between job strain and
psychological distress was observed. Low decision latitude was
associated with higher psychological distress prevalence. High
psychological demand was associated with higher psychological disorder
prevalence. In all studies, workers in high strain situation presented
the highest psychological distress prevalence. Considering low strain
quadrant as the reference group, the prevalence ratio ranged from 1.39
to 2.32, after controlling to confounders using regression logistic.
Workers in the active job quadrant also presented high prevalence of
PD. Psychological demand was strongly associated to psychological
distress. Otherwise, decision latitude, as an isolated indicator,
wasn't associated to psychological distress in two studies. Findings
suggest that JCQ is a good instrument to predict negative effect on
worker's mental health.
Learning Objectives: In the recent years, in Brazil, several studies evaluated the association between work psychosocial aspects and psychological distress (PD). The Job Content Questionnaire (JCQ) was used to measure the work psychosocial dimensions. Objective: to evaluate the validity of JCQ in predicting psychological distress among workers from different occupational groups. Methodology: Five epidemiological cross-sectional studies were carried out in populations from the State of Bahia, Brazil: one population-based study (a representative sample of Feira de Santana City; 1,311 workers) and four different occupational groups studies: teachers (808), professors (314), dentists (130) and nurses (502). The population-based study compared formal and informal workers. Similar methodology and procedures were used in all four studies. SRQ-20 was used to measure psychological distress. Results: A similar pattern of the association between job strain and psychological distress was observed. Low decision latitude was associated with higher psychological distress prevalence. High psychological demand was associated with higher psychological disorder prevalence. In all studies, workers in high strain situation presented the highest psychological distress prevalence. Considering low strain quadrant as the reference group, the prevalence ratio ranged from 1.39 to 2.32, after controlling to confounders using regression logistic. Workers in the active job quadrant also presented high prevalence of PD. Psychological demand was strongly associated to psychological distress. Otherwise, decision latitude, as an isolated indicator, wasn't associated to psychological distress in two studies. Findings suggest that JCQ is a good instrument to predict negative effect on worker's mental health
Sub-Theme: Environmental and Occupational Health
See more of: Public Health Practices Around the Globe