86.58 How programmes, people, places and processes interact: An example of the implementation of a community-based pilot programme for women living with HIV in Montreal, Canada

Wednesday, April 29, 2009
Sadrivaan A and B (The Hilton Istanbul Hotel )
S. Lory Hovsepian, Ph.D., candidate Université de Montréal, Canada
Joanne Otis Université du Québec à Montréal, Canada
Astrid Brousselle Université de Montréal, Canada
Community-university collaborators of the programme "Pouvoir Partager/Pouvoirs Partagés" Canada Research Chair in Health Education, Canada
Background: Community-university collaborators developed and implemented “Pouvoir Partager/Pouvoirs Partagés”, a community-based pilot programme helping women living with HIV in Montreal, Canada to effectively manage the disclosure of their HIV status. Objective: To assess how the programme was implemented, and to explain how factors relating to the programme, its development and evaluation processes, its implementation context, as well as to the target population, participants and other stakeholders influenced programme implementation. Methods: We used a multiple-embedded case study approach, with cases consisting of each of the 8 settings in which the programme was foreseen to be implemented (6 community organizations, 1 hospital and 1 community clinic). Process analysis was undertaken. Interviews with the head researcher, programme coordinators, representatives of organizations and interventionists (n = 22), focus groups with programme participants (n = 4) and committee meeting observations were conducted. Results: Four out of eight settings implemented the programme. Organizational characteristics and capacity, programme fit with the implementing setting, and stakeholder attitudes influenced the decision to implement. Programme promotion was difficult for all settings; social representations of HIV/AIDS, organizational characteristics and reach into the target population, relevance of recruitment strategies, recruiter characteristics and programme characteristics influenced the recruitment process. Programme relevance and participants’ readiness to participate, convenient programme modalities and women’s implication in the research process influenced women’s participation in the programme. Extent of programme coverage was similar across the four implementation settings; the research context, participant characteristics and programme modalities were influential at this stage. Conclusion: Successfully implementing programmes for women living with HIV requires recognizing the different levels of factors that are at play, their interconnections, and how different combinations of factors are influential at each stage of the programme’s life. Such an understanding will facilitate the process of mutual adaptation between the programme and its context, thus maximising successful implementation.

Learning Objectives: 1) Identify factors facilitating and hindering the implementation of programmes aiming to help improve the quality of life of women living with HIV; 2) Recognize the importance of ensuring the fit between programs, target populations and stakeholders, settings, and programme development and evaluation processes at different stages in a programme’s life as a means to facilitate successful programme implementation.

Sub-Theme: Lessons learned from community-based public health research