Thursday, April 30, 2009
Sadrivaan A and B (The Hilton Istanbul Hotel )
Introduction. Evidences show that effective glycemic control is important in the management of diabetic patients. Our research aims to evaluate the quality of diabetes management and describes related factors with glysemic control in three different hospitals in Istanbul .
Methods. The research was descriptive, and conducted in three different public, private and university hospitals inIstanbul . 392 outpatient type 2 diabetics were included to the study. Patients had type 2 diabetes for at least six months. Data was collected with a face to face questionnaire. Questionnaires included questions about patient’s demographic characteristics, disease history, complications, disease management, and medical therapy information. Descriptive statistics, chi square and logistic regression were used in statistical analysis.
Findings. The mean age was 60.32±10.37 and the mean disease duration was 10.25±7.82 years. Mean HgbA1c level was 7.03±1.47, 59.2% of patients had a normal level. University hospital attendants were fount to have more normal HgbA1c levels (p<0.05). However, university hospital patients had more complications; more diet lists and glucometric devices. State hospital patients were found out to be more obese. Private hospital patients had more diet lists and took adequate diabetic patient education. Patients with low education and low socioeconomic level, had no diet list, received insufficient diet list practicing, and obesity was related with high blood HgbA1c levels (p<0.05). In multivariate analysis, attending a hospital, socioeconomic level, having a diet list and practicing the diet list, and having glucometric devices were related with glysemic control quality.
Conclusion. There were important differences between hospitals concerning glysemic control program outcomes. Education and socioeconomic level, diet list practicing and obesity control are important factors for type 2 diabetes management and hospital intervention programs should focus on these factors for diabetes management. There is need for standardized diabetes management programs for hospitals.
Methods. The research was descriptive, and conducted in three different public, private and university hospitals in
Findings. The mean age was 60.32±10.37 and the mean disease duration was 10.25±7.82 years. Mean HgbA1c level was 7.03±1.47, 59.2% of patients had a normal level. University hospital attendants were fount to have more normal HgbA1c levels (p<0.05). However, university hospital patients had more complications; more diet lists and glucometric devices. State hospital patients were found out to be more obese. Private hospital patients had more diet lists and took adequate diabetic patient education. Patients with low education and low socioeconomic level, had no diet list, received insufficient diet list practicing, and obesity was related with high blood HgbA1c levels (p<0.05). In multivariate analysis, attending a hospital, socioeconomic level, having a diet list and practicing the diet list, and having glucometric devices were related with glysemic control quality.
Conclusion. There were important differences between hospitals concerning glysemic control program outcomes. Education and socioeconomic level, diet list practicing and obesity control are important factors for type 2 diabetes management and hospital intervention programs should focus on these factors for diabetes management. There is need for standardized diabetes management programs for hospitals.
Learning Objectives: Effective diabetes management and related factors
Sub-Theme: The global threat of chronic diseases
See more of: Poster: The Global Threat of Chronic Diseases
See more of: Public Health Practices Around the Globe
See more of: Public Health Practices Around the Globe