Wednesday, April 29, 2009
Sadrivaan A and B (The Hilton Istanbul Hotel )
Taking into account the growing number of academic articles and health policies focusing on Health Promotion, one may consider that there have been fragmented positions which approach the role that Education historically played in the development of social policies evolving interdisciplinary and intersectoral models – far beyond those medical-biological centered models – addressing the improvement of life quality and Health and fostering community participation and empowerment. These major values of Health Promotion (Ottawa Charter, 1986) are the same that, in Latin America, have legitimated and guaranteed strong arguments for changing movements from the traditional hygienicists policies of the so called Sanitary Education, in the beginning of the last past century, to participatory and pedagogical (dialogical) approaches of the Education on Health. Academic studies, forums and national and international conferences along the 70’s and 80’s, highlighted the role of the Education on Health in shifting the medical-preventivist paradigm and in the enlargement of the concept of Health in actions and public health policies. Paulo Freire’ thoughts and writings, his international recognition and his strong influence in community based development programs and in participatory practices evolving the Education and Health are also concrete facts in this perspective. What could explain this lack of synchronism between the Education – on Freire’s paradigm and perspectives - the Education on Health and the Health Promotion? Even recognizing the methodological weakness in the development of models to evaluate Education on Health programs, one may assume that the scarcity of evidences does not justify this lack of synchrony. Which are the parameters to evaluate the effectiveness of the social participation in the improvement of life and Health? How to infer intersectorality on Health projects and policies? For its sustainability and development, as much as the Education on Health, the Health Promotion needs address these types of questions.
Learning Objectives: The authors will be describing and analyzing barriers and opportunities in the reverse process, to identify and to guarantee visibility the Education, as the major theoretical and practical contributor to improve and to promote healthy public policies.The authors assumes that the political and theoretical advances on Health Promotion in Latin America and other regions coincide - in great deal - with movements to foster and re-qualifying values and historical principles that had guided the changes of paradigms from the Sanitary Education for the Education on Health.
Sub-Theme: Lessons learned from community-based public health research