Wednesday, April 29, 2009
Behcet Uz (The Hilton Istanbul Hotel )
We evaluated five W. K. Kellogg-funded Community Partnerships between academic, health service, and community partners in South Africa. Across the five participating partnerships, 668 partnership members completed self administered questionnaires to assess the operational, functional and organisational characteristics that contribute to stakeholders’ perceptions of the skills of their partnership’s leadership. Across the five partnerships and six stakeholder groups, more than half (53%) of leadership skills were explained by ten factors. Each partnership displayed its unique footprint of factors that accounted for its leadership levels. Similarly, each stakeholder group had its unique signature of factors that were associated with its leadership. Two factors (communication mechanisms and operational understanding) accounted for more than 25% of leadership skills; management capabilities and participation benefits contributed 4% and 3%; and effectiveness, benefits to difficulties ratio of being a member, engagement in education, flow of information and sense of ownership accounted for 2% to 3% each. Leaders, managers, administrators, researchers, civic agencies and funding bodies involved in partnership working will need to pay attention to these
characteristics as well as other factors.
Learning Objectives: 1. Describe 29 different barriers and facilitators critical to successful Partnerships between Academia, Practice and Community. 2. Appraise and compare the factors that account for good leadership skills across each community partnership and stakeholder group and their implications 3. Evaluate the specific impact of community partnerships and the stakeholder groups on skills of the leadership.
Sub-Theme: Successful partnerships between academia and practice
See more of: Successful Partnerships Between Academia and Practice
See more of: Public Health Practices Around the Globe
See more of: Public Health Practices Around the Globe