Strengthening Civil Society Institutional Work in HIV/AIDS

Materials and methods: the methodological structure is composed of three flexible modules, interlinked and raised to integrate human resources, methodological support, context and the social function that plays. Results: The program run in thirteen institutions work in HIV/AIDS. Finding the following points: lack of knowledge among members. Professional profiles are too far in relation to the institutional roles. There is a space for training. The purpose was so closed that prevents the budgetary participation elsewhere so projects are far from the original idea. There is no hierarchy institutional bringing as a consequence rivalries in the leadership, struggles for the recognition, avoidance of truncated actions and consequences. You are no Diagnostics for the development of projects therefore are over valued, custom and no theoretical basis. It lacks an administrative model for transparency and accountability. There are no rules of procedure to regulate and evaluated institutional practices. Conclusions: The construction of seventy-five custom files, together with a schedule of training internal to and from the members. Clarification and dissemination of the corporate purpose, mission and vision, as well as areas and responsible institutional, restoring the spaces and services to the public in general. Planning of care and prevention of HIV/AIDS and STI from sustainability projects. The call for a national workshop for strengthening other 50 institutions for regional models of monitoring, follow-up and institutional strengthening of civil society to work in HIV/AIDS.